 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 Customer Reviews |
|  | | | | | | | | | |
5 out of 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan L
|
|
|
| My best jersey |
Feb 21, 2013 |
|
| Best jersey in PPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRANCISCO H
INGLEWOOD, CA |
|
|
| Best Jersey ever |
Sep 2, 2012 |
|
| This by far is the best jersey I've owned the material and look on the jersey is excellent I was kind of sceptical buying this jersey. I read some bad reviews on the jersey but I beleive every Packers fan that buys it will be HAPPY. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRAVIS B
GALLOWAY, OH |
|
|
| Nike trumps Reebok. |
May 7, 2012 |
|
| It's been ten years since Nike owned the rights to The Shield's products. With this year's Elite jerseys, they have made a glorious return. This A-Rod jersey easily tops any of the Reebok jerseys in my collection--in comfort, fit, (apparent) workmanship, and style. The mesh that makes up the torso is softer, providing increased flexibility, yet somehow seemingly tougher than Reebok's. Though a different material than the mesh body, the yoke and side gussets also are softer and more comfortable than their Reebok predecessor, without sacrificing any toughness. Better still, the yoke and gussets are no longer "dazzle nylon" but a matte finish instead, so I look a little less obnoxious if I wear my jersey to a bar. I'd compare the style, then, to a classic Mitchell & Ness Nitschke jersey--rather than the slightly flashier products we've seen the past ten years. Is it worth the increased price point? Debatable, but you definitely won't be disappointed. Regarding fit: I'm 6'2", 275 lbs. I considered the 56 but ordered the 52, and it fits perfectly. If you're debating the investment, I hope this wordy review helps. Go Pack, Go! |
|
|
|
|
